The Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), administered by Educational Testing Service (ETS), is accepted for admission to graduate programs across virtually every academic discipline — from law and medicine to engineering, education, humanities, and social sciences. Its breadth makes it the most widely used graduate admissions exam in the world, and the most common exam for which candidates from diverse academic backgrounds seek accommodations.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, ETS provides accommodations for candidates with documented disabilities or health-related needs. The documentation bar is high — and incomplete documentation is the most common reason for delays or denials. We provide comprehensive psychological evaluations structured specifically to meet ETS’s requirements, giving you the strongest possible basis for approval on your first submission.
Schedule a Free Consultation Call 617-680-5488How ETS’s Accommodation Process Differs from LSAC, AAMC, and GMAC
ETS administers not only the GRE but also the TOEFL, Praxis, and other standardized exams. This matters for accommodation purposes because ETS has specific transfer policies that no other major testing organization offers — and understanding them can save you significant time and cost.
Prior accommodation approval may transfer
This is one of the most underutilized features of ETS’s accommodation process. If you have been approved for accommodations on the SAT, GMAT, or another ETS exam (such as the TOEFL or Praxis), ETS may accept that prior approval letter in place of full documentation for the GRE. In some cases, you can simply forward your existing approval letter to ETS Disability Services rather than submitting a new evaluation.
Similarly, if you received accommodations through a college or university disability services office and are currently enrolled, you may be able to submit Part III of ETS’s disability form rather than a full testing documentation package.
ETS’s recency requirement is stricter than most
ETS generally requires documentation within the past three years for psychological and neurodevelopmental conditions — more recent than the three-to-five year window GMAC and most bar boards apply. For ADHD specifically, ETS’s reviewers are aware that adult presentation can evolve and that compensatory strategies can mask impairment in dated evaluations. A current evaluation is strongly recommended in almost all cases regardless of what prior documentation exists.
GRE vs. GMAT: a note for applicants considering both
Many graduate business school applicants consider both the GRE and the GMAT. ETS and GMAC conduct independent reviews — approval on one does not automatically transfer to the other in the way ETS’s internal transfer policy works. If you plan to apply for accommodations on both exams, we can structure a single evaluation to satisfy both organizations’ requirements simultaneously.
ScoreSelect: a GRE-specific advantage for accommodated test takers
The GRE’s ScoreSelect feature allows candidates to choose which test scores to send to graduate programs — you can send only your most recent scores, or only your best scores from the past five years. This is particularly relevant for candidates who previously tested without accommodations and scored below their ability level. A retake with appropriate accommodations, combined with ScoreSelect, allows you to present programs only with the scores that reflect your true ability. No other major graduate admissions exam offers this degree of score reporting flexibility.
What ETS Typically Grants with Appropriate Documentation
⏱ Extended Time — 25%
Additional 25% time on all sections. Available for mild-to-moderate functional limitations. Less commonly granted than 50% but appropriate when documentation shows impairment without reaching the threshold for time-and-a-half.
⏱ Extended Time — 50%
Time-and-a-half on all sections. The most commonly approved accommodation. Requires documented processing speed, reading fluency, or attentional deficits with clear functional impact on timed performance.
⏱⏱ Extended Time — 100%
Double time on all sections. Requires stronger quantitative evidence — typically significant impairment across multiple domains or co-occurring conditions. Available but less frequently granted.
☕ Extra Breaks
Stop-the-clock breaks between sections for candidates with documented conditions affecting stamina, self-regulation, medical needs, or physical conditions. Candidates with breaks approved can self-schedule online.
🔇 Separate Testing Room
Private or small-group testing environment for candidates with documented attentional dysregulation, anxiety, or sensory sensitivities exacerbated by the standard test center environment.
🖥 Screen Magnification
Screen magnification software for candidates with visual impairments. Candidates approved for screen magnification can self-schedule online — one of the four accommodations with online self-scheduling access.
🎨 Selectable Colors
Adjustable background and foreground colors for candidates with visual processing conditions, light sensitivity, or reading-based disabilities. Available as a self-schedulable online accommodation.
📖 Assistive Technology
Screen readers (including JAWS with or without refreshable braille devices), text-to-speech, and other approved assistive tools. These require manual scheduling via your approval letter instructions rather than online self-scheduling.
👤 Human Support
Reader, scribe, oral interpreter, and sign language interpreter for candidates with physical, sensory, or language-based disabilities. Requires manual scheduling coordination with ETS.
How We Document Your Condition for ETS
ETS evaluates documentation against three criteria: a diagnosed disability, a substantial limitation on major life activities, and a clear rationale connecting the condition to the specific accommodations requested. The third criterion — the explicit link between diagnosis and accommodation — is where most inadequate evaluations fail. Our reports are built around that connection from the start.
GRE Accommodations for ADHD
ADHD documentation for ETS requires more than behavioral rating scales. ETS expects objective performance-based data demonstrating measurable impairment — not just self-reported symptoms. For adult candidates, this means performance testing that documents current functional impairment rather than a diagnosis history that predates significant compensatory skill development.
The GRE’s three-section structure — Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning, and Analytical Writing — places distinct demands on working memory, sustained attention across extended passages, and written production under time pressure. Our evaluation addresses each section’s specific cognitive demands explicitly.
Representative measures: Conners Continuous Performance Test-3 (CPT-3), WAIS-IV/V Processing Speed and Working Memory Indices, Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale (BAARS-IV), Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function — Adult (BRIEF-A), Trail Making Test A/B, Stroop Color-Word Test.
GRE Accommodations for Anxiety
Anxiety-based accommodation requests for the GRE must demonstrate that the condition produces measurable cognitive impairment under timed testing conditions — not simply that standardized testing is stressful. ETS’s reviewers apply particular scrutiny to anxiety requests because subjective distress without objective functional impairment does not meet the ADA’s “substantial limitation” standard.
The GRE’s Analytical Writing section presents a specific challenge for candidates with performance anxiety or perfectionism — it requires sustained written production under time pressure with no ability to review other questions first, unlike the multiple-choice sections. Documentation that addresses this specific format characteristic is more compelling than general statements about test anxiety.
Representative measures: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) or MMPI-3 with validity scales, WAIS-IV/V Processing Speed Index, cognitive efficiency measures under time pressure.
GRE Accommodations for Learning Disabilities
Reading-based learning disabilities are among the strongest bases for GRE extended time requests. The GRE’s Verbal Reasoning section includes long reading comprehension passages requiring rapid integration of dense text with inferential reasoning — a task that disproportionately affects candidates with dyslexia or reading fluency deficits. Documentation must establish the discrepancy between cognitive ability and reading performance, and must demonstrate that the deficit is current and functionally meaningful under timed conditions.
Representative measures: Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ-IV), Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-4), Test of Word Reading Efficiency-2 (TOWRE-2), Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-2 (CTOPP-2), WAIS-IV/V for cognitive benchmarking.
The Role of Validity Scales
ETS requires that psychological evaluations include measures assessing the validity and reliability of the findings — ruling out lack of effort or symptom exaggeration. Our evaluations routinely include validity-scale instruments (PAI or MMPI-3 with embedded validity indices, or performance validity measures as appropriate), which both meet ETS’s requirement and strengthen the overall credibility of the report. An evaluation without validity measures is more likely to prompt a supplemental documentation request from ETS.
What We Measure — and What It Documents for ETS
| Domain | Representative Measures | What It Documents for ETS |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Ability | WAIS-IV/V Full Scale and Index Scores | Baseline intelligence; discrepancy analysis for LD |
| Processing Speed | WAIS-IV/V PSI, Symbol Search, Coding, Trail Making A | Primary support for extended time requests |
| Working Memory | WAIS-IV/V WMI, Digit Span, Arithmetic | Passage retention; multi-step quantitative reasoning |
| Sustained Attention | CPT-3, TOVA | ADHD endurance across full exam administration |
| Executive Functioning | D-KEFS, BRIEF-A, Trail Making B, Stroop | Cognitive flexibility; written production under pressure |
| Reading and Achievement | WJ-IV, WIAT-4, TOWRE-2 | Dyslexia; reading fluency under time pressure |
| Phonological Processing | CTOPP-2 | Reading disorder at the phonological level |
| Anxiety and Mood | BAI, STAI, PAI or MMPI-3 | Anxiety severity; functional cognitive impact |
| Validity / Effort | PAI validity scales, MMPI-3, DCT or WMT | ETS-required credibility evidence; rules out exaggeration |
What a GRE Accommodation Request Looks Like in Practice
A 24-year-old recent college graduate contacted us ten weeks before her GRE date while preparing applications to clinical psychology doctoral programs. She had been diagnosed with dyslexia in fourth grade, had received extended time through her university’s disability services office for four years, and had assumed her university documentation would be sufficient for ETS. ETS returned her request with a supplemental documentation notice — her university DSO records did not include the objective performance testing ETS requires.
Our evaluation confirmed a specific learning disorder in reading with processing speed in the 21st percentile, reading fluency in the 17th percentile, and phonological processing deficits consistent with a persistent reading disorder — despite strong vocabulary scores and above-average verbal reasoning on untimed measures. The pattern was clinically coherent and directly relevant to the GRE Verbal Reasoning section’s reading comprehension demands.
The report included a section explicitly addressing the GRE’s specific task demands — distinguishing between untimed verbal ability (strong) and timed reading fluency under the exam’s pacing requirements (significantly impaired). ETS approved 50% extended time on first resubmission within three weeks.
She subsequently used GRE ScoreSelect to send only her accommodated scores — the scores from her earlier unaided attempt were not included in any program application. Her accommodated Verbal Reasoning score was 18 points higher than her prior unaided score, reflecting genuine ability rather than the constraint of her reading disability under time pressure.
The ScoreSelect outcome illustrates a practical point worth noting: for candidates who have tested without accommodations and plan to retest, the GRE offers a degree of score presentation control that the LSAT and MCAT do not. Getting the documentation right for a retake is worth the investment.
How Far in Advance to Start
ETS typically takes four to six weeks to review a complete accommodation request — longer during peak graduate application season (October through December). You must have accommodation approval before you can schedule your test date. We recommend beginning the evaluation process at least ten to twelve weeks before your target GRE date.
- Free consultation — we review your history, existing documentation, and whether the prior approval transfer pathway applies to your situation (Weeks 1–2)
- Evaluation sessions — typically one to two sessions, conducted virtually or in person (Weeks 2–4)
- Report preparation and delivery — two to three weeks after testing is complete (Weeks 4–6)
- ETS submission and review — four to six weeks; longer during peak season (Weeks 7–12)
- Test scheduling — online self-scheduling for four common accommodation types; manual coordination for others (Week 12+)
GRE Accommodations: Common Questions
These questions focus on what is specific to the GRE and ETS. For general questions about the evaluation process and what conditions qualify, see our psychological testing FAQs.
Possibly — and this is one of the most underutilized features of ETS’s accommodation process. If you have a current approval letter from College Board (SAT), GMAC (GMAT), or another ETS exam (such as the TOEFL or Praxis), ETS may accept that letter in place of full documentation for the GRE, provided the approval is still current and the accommodations match what you are requesting.
This transfer pathway is not automatic — ETS reviews each case individually. But it can significantly reduce the documentation burden and timeline if it applies to your situation. Bring your existing approval letter to your free consultation and we will advise on whether it is likely to qualify or whether a current evaluation would be the stronger path.
Not necessarily. If you are currently enrolled and receiving accommodations through your institution’s disability services office, ETS may allow you to submit Part III of their disability form rather than full testing documentation.
However, this pathway applies specifically to currently enrolled students — not recent graduates. And university DSO documentation that consists only of a clinician’s letter or brief diagnostic note, rather than a comprehensive psychoeducational evaluation, may not satisfy ETS even if the institution accepted it. We can review your specific documentation during the free consultation and tell you honestly which pathway is appropriate for your situation.
GRE ScoreSelect allows you to choose which test scores to send to graduate programs when you apply. You can send only your most recent scores, or select your best scores from any GRE administration within the past five years. Programs receive only the scores you choose to send.
For candidates who tested without accommodations and scored below their ability level, this means a retake with appropriate accommodations can effectively replace your prior score in the eyes of admissions committees — they will see only the accommodated result if that is what you choose to send. This is a meaningful advantage the GRE has over the LSAT (which requires all scores to be reported) and the MCAT (which reports all attempts). If you have a prior unaided GRE score you are concerned about, the combination of proper accommodations and ScoreSelect is worth discussing during your consultation.
No. ETS does not disclose accommodation status on score reports. Programs receive the same score report regardless of whether accommodations were used, and there is no annotation indicating that extended time or other supports were in place during testing.
Combined with ScoreSelect, this means you have full control over both which scores programs see and no disclosure of the testing conditions under which those scores were earned. This is a considerably more applicant-friendly disclosure framework than the LSAT’s extended-time reporting policy.
In most cases, yes. ETS’s three-year recency requirement for psychological conditions is stricter than what GMAC and most bar boards apply. A four-year-old evaluation is technically outside ETS’s standard window and is likely to result in a supplemental documentation request, which will delay your timeline.
That said, ETS does note that recency requirements can vary by condition — for stable, well-documented conditions with a long history, some flexibility may exist. If you have an evaluation that is marginally outside the window, bring it to your free consultation before assuming you need a complete new evaluation. We can advise on whether a targeted update or a full new evaluation is the appropriate path.
It depends on which accommodations were approved. ETS allows online self-scheduling through your ETS account if your approved accommodations consist only of extended time, extra breaks, screen magnification, or selectable background and foreground colors. For any other approved accommodation — assistive technology, human readers, alternate formats, separate room, or others — your approval letter will include manual scheduling instructions instead of online access.
This distinction matters for planning. If your accommodations include anything beyond the four self-schedulable options, build additional coordination time into your timeline before your target test date.
In most cases, yes — with planning. ETS and LSAC have different documentation requirements and conduct independent reviews. However, a single comprehensive evaluation from our practice can be structured to satisfy both sets of requirements simultaneously.
One important difference: LSAC’s extended-time scoring policy differs from ETS’s. LSAT extended-time scores are reported separately to law schools with a disclosure statement; GRE scores carry no such notation. If disclosure is a consideration in your decision between the two exams, this is worth factoring in. We can discuss both exams’ accommodation frameworks during your consultation if you are weighing your options.
Schedule a Free Consultation → or Read about LSAT Accommodations →
